There is a fascinating story not being covered by the mainstream press about the Romneys ties to Mexico and the war being waged by the Mexican Mormons against the Narco traffickers. If you haven’t seen it, it’s well worth a look.

See the full documentary here.



  1. MajFauxPas says:

    “Mexican – Mormon”, “Decriminalization”.
    You’re welocme.

    …. wait, Mexican Mormons?

  2. Admfubar says:

    Mexican Mormons, they eat their own with salsa!

  3. jbenson2 says:

    The documentary reminds me of a few other similar wacko documentaries. 1.) Man never set foot on the moon 2.) Bush masterminded the collapse of the World Trade Center 3.) Aliens hidden in Roswell

    • McCullough says:

      I swear I don’t have a clue as to what you’re talking about. I don’t think you do either.

      • jbenson2 says:

        Nice try, but I think you do.

        You and Uncle Dave are obsessed with re-electing Obama. The President cannot campaign on anything positive he has accomplished so all he has in his bag of tricks are strawman attacks on Romney like your article.

        It’s not working.

        Latest Gallup poll results – Romney 51% / Obama 45%

        • McCullough says:

          You must be new here.

          First, you didn’t watch the doc or you would see this as politically neutral. If anything, it puts Mormons in a positive light. The comments about Mitt come from his own family, and their Mormon friends as Mexican citizens.

          Second, You see my name at the top of the post? Click on it. You will see that I am / have always been a Ron Paul supporter. But if I see something I perceive as negative against either candidate, I post it.

          If you don’t like it, you are welcome to leave, anytime.

          It’s true, I don’t like Romney, and I won’t vote for him. But hey, it’s not MY fault the guy’s a dick.

          And don’t ever call me an Obamabot.

  4. Ah_Yea says:

    Who knows how accurate the report is, but I did find it fascinating.

    What I got out of this was. Those Mexican Mormons are way more badass than the Mexican Government, although to call this a “war” stretching the facts far beyond responsible journalism. See parts 3 and 4.

    Not that our mainstream press is responsible, but even they balk at backing this story.

  5. Ah_Yea says:

    I just noticed.

    Morman?????

    What’s a Morman? Is there a Morwoman???

  6. orchidcup says:

    Behold, the day of the Lord cometh, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land desolate; and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it.

    For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light; the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine.

    And I will punish the world for evil, and the wicked for their iniquity; I will cause the arrogancy of the proud to cease, and will lay down the haughtiness of the terrible.

    I will make a man more precious than fine gold; even a man than the golden wedge of Ophir.

    Therefore, I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the Lord of Hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger.

    And it shall be as the chased roe, and as a sheep that no man taketh up; and they shall every man turn to his own people, and flee every one into his own land.

    Every one that is proud shall be thrust through; yea, and every one that is joined to the wicked shall fall by the sword.

    Their children, also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled and their wives ravished.

    Behold, I will stir up the Medes against them, which shall not regard silver and gold, nor shall they delight in it.

    Their bows shall also dash the young men to pieces, and they shall have no pity on the fruit of the womb; their eyes shall not spare children.

    And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees’ excellency, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah.

    It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation: neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds make their fold there.

    But wild beasts of the desert shall lie there; and their houses shall be full of doleful creatures; and owls shall dwell there, and satyrs shall dance there.

    2 Nephi 23:9-21

    The Book of Mormon

  7. Jeroen says:

    did mr. Dvorak notice what the guy said at 5:38 “mormons aren’t allowed to own guns”
    a republican without a gun???
    who are the NRA people going to vote for now?

  8. Taxed Enough Already Dude says:

    It is fascinating and I agree decriminalization is the likely solution. We can always recrimminalize it if that doesn’t work out.

    But no one would get elected promising that….its something a leader must take up, as the right thing to do…not only to remove the “opportunity” from gangs, and purge corruption from our Government, and spare us the judicial costs…but to lessen drug use as drug taxes pay for rehab and education.

    • Taxed Enough Already Dude says:

      One caveat, don’t decriminalize to allow the free market package and distribute drugs as a product…That would increase drug use.

      Rather let bloated inefficient Government dole it out for a fee…never advertising the “joys of drug use.” The typical “government experience” would repel most, just as the typical DMV experience is something everyone tries to avoid.

      • spsffan says:

        And your as described DMV experience would effectively preserve a portion of the black market. If in addition to government doling out the drugs, they did all the other things that are needed to reduce the costs of the drug wars, like cutting way back on enforcement, the black markets will flourish!

        • Taxed Enough Already Dude says:

          If harmful drugs become products in a free market, private enterprise genius will drive usage to saturation….

          The benefits of decriminalization would be lost.

          Making it available to users without “pushing it” accomplishes the good….ends the corruption of Government, police and courts…stops financing gangs…just like ending prohibition did.

          And making the process of obtaining it somewhat unpleasant makes drug use “uncool”….

          You are correct to say some underground outlets might survive, but the profits of these would be vastly curtailed.

          No way the black markets flourish…

  9. msbpodcast says:

    Mittenz’ attitude is typical Neo Con when it comes to drug law enforcement: “Just say NO!“* (and when that fails they jail your ass and force you to work for nothing per hour in their “facilities“)

    There is no problem so dire that somebody can’t make a buck from it; even if only to sell the executioner the rope used to hang the merchant with.

    Mittenz would sell the “[OUT OF BUSINESS]” sign that we’d have to put on the padlocked gates to this country. (O’Mama ain’t a whole lot better.)

    *) It was Nancy Reagan‘s favorite saying: NO! (Poor Ronnie)

  10. I have seen worse things from “better people”
    Yet what of the Obama’s ?
    Time to go on a vacation to Mexico

  11. MikeN says:

    Dilbert has endorsed Romney for President, on the grounds that Obama is locking up marijuana folks in California who are in accord with state law.

    Let’s say a CEO does a great job for stockholders; he increases profits five-fold, treats the employees well, and causes the stock price to skyrocket. He’s a superstar. One day the public learns that the CEO killed a guy to get ahead in his career, but the CEO doesn’t get convicted because his clever attorney gets him off on a technicality. Assume in this hypothetical situation that the public correctly believes the CEO killed a guy to advance his career. Should the board of directors allow the superstar CEO to keep his job? Or is killing a guy to advance your career always a firing offense?

    Okay, keep your answer in mind.

    The next question is for supporters of President Obama. Let’s say your political views map closely to the President’s positions. He’s your guy. But suppose you found out he once killed an American citizen in the United States to help his reelection. And assume, as with the CEO example, that the facts of the killing are undisputed and the President found a legal means to avoid prosecution. In that hypothetical case, would you still vote for President Obama? Or would you say it is a firing offense for a President to kill a citizen to advance his career?

    • bobbo, the pragmatic existential evangelical anti-theist says:

      The one death is irrelevant.

      such is real politik.

      but if either man said “trust me” or “I’ve never killed anybody” I’d know he was not trusthworthy and was lying.

      But, I know that already.

      Most don’t.

  12. Rick says:

    If the Mormons win, good luck even finding a caffeinated drink in the stores much less alcohol