Who Won the Debate?

  • Obama
  • Romney
  • Tie
  • That was a debate?

Results



  1. MikeN says:

    60% return betting on Obama! Go to InTrade now!

  2. MikeN says:

    That poll should read Obama/Crowley.
    How did she have the transcript in front of her?
    And how did Obama know she had the transcript, when he said ‘get the transcript’?

    Has he ever said ‘please proceed’ in response to a question at these debates? No, he wanted to set Romney up for a takedown from the moderator. All Romney had to do was say, why did you leave for Vegas after what you knew was a terrorist attack?

    • bobbo, the pragmatic existential evangelical anti-theist says:

      All your talking points are belong to us.

      Nonsense dittohead chatter that makes no sense unless you are currently drunk on the Kool Aid.

      That poll should read Obama/Crowley. /// Blame the Messenger psychosis.

      How did she have the transcript in front of her? /// She Didn’t.

      And how did Obama know she had the transcript, when he said ‘get the transcript’? /// If she “had” the transcript, she wouldn’t have to “get it” now would she?

      Has he ever said ‘please proceed’ in response to a question at these debates? /// Never said Rmoney was a stinking lying bag of shit either. Whats your point about the infinity of things that were not said. Silly.

      No, he wanted to set Romney up for a takedown from the moderator. /// “I see Conspiracies….everywhere.”

      All Romney had to do was say, why did you leave for Vegas after what you knew was a terrorist attack? /// To best serve America as the Republican Party is doing more damage to America than any Terrorist Attack ever could. Brain rot such as you demonstrate—not good for America, or anywhere else for that matter.

      • MikeN says:

        She said on the View that she had the transcript in front of her.

        • bobbo, the pragmatic existential evangelical anti-theist says:

          I did not know that. I still wonder if Obama knew that. The exchange we are batting around is “consistent” with that but could have been said equally as probable without any such fact or knowledge BECAUSE the Libya situation was recent and on everyone’s mind.

          I take you at your word and apologize.

          • MikeN says:

            My original interpretation was that ‘get the transcript’ was directed towards Romney. But knowing that Crowley had the transcript, and then realizing that Obama said ‘please proceed’ I now interpret it as a setup.

          • bobbo, the pragmatic existential evangelical anti-theist says:

            Thats NOT what you posted just above.

            Silly to go onto a blog and initiate made up BS. How soon do you plan to run in Republican Politics?

            Dolt. Dishonest and Stupid. You will go far.

        • tcc3 says:

          Can you link to where she said that? The clip I found said she remembered it/heard his speech in the Rose Garden.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fvaSNdAidU

    • MikeN says:

      And it sure looks like Obama knew who would be asking the question. He’s over there and saying Hi, Kerry before the guy even realizes he is next. Obama covers it up by asking for the guy’s name, after he had just said ,”Hi, Kerry”.

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Obviously Obama rattled MikeN.

  3. deowll says:

    I’m a little puzzled about this because people say Obama won the debate but what he said doesn’t seem to be swaying the voters. On the other hand Romney is supposed to have lost but so far the evidence suggests that people continue to be swayed by what he said….If the objective is to win the campaign Romney didn’t lose. At best/worst this is a tie.

    • MikeN says:

      Then why is InTrade showing a gain for Obama? People who put their money on it thought Obama improved his already good chances of victory.

      • MikeN says:

        Expect Obama’s numbers to go up even more as people realize they can get a 50-60% return on their money in a matter of weeks.

    • Dallas says:

      I’d agree the American Sheeple have a short attention span of like 10 minutes and don’t look past one year ago.

      Willard is banking his campaign on this strategy and lying all the way through. It’s a reasonable strategy

      • MikeN says:

        Yup, it’s how Democrats getting elected even though Communism was a disaster everywhere.

      • MikeN says:

        Are you rationalizing an Obama loss already? You need to bet money on Romney too, so you can at least make money off it. Don’t forget to give your fair share to the Democratic Party. Obama is sending out mailers like it’s a bill to be collected.

      • Dallas says:

        Personally, I’m a winner no matter who wins.

        I’m voting for my country not for personal wealth. I’m voting for the negro.

        • MikeN says:

          That’s the spirit. But try to say it in a way that wouldn’t get you fired at most companies or kicked out of school.

          • pedro says:

            You’re mean! You made DUllass make his daily affirmation public. Hope he feels better after your vicious attack on his feeble ego (Nah! Not really)

          • noname says:

            PP(pointless pedro) for today’s daily affirmation a vote was taken, you won!

            You won, first place; the world most ignorant moron.

  4. bobbo, the pragmatic existential evangelical anti-theist says:

    Making me doubt my “take things at face value” position, MikeN says:
    10/18/2012 at 5:03 pm

    She said on the View that she had the transcript in front of her.

    ////////// Little Help Mike?

    Forbes, a conservative source, does not say that in their review of the issue. http://forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2012/10/17/candy-crowley-explains-controversial-debate-performance-i-had-a-flashback-to-when-my-children-were-young/

    And where is “should be said” during the View segment, she makes no reference to having the transcript: See 19:30==
    http://abc.go.com/watch/the-view/SH559080/VD55240286/the-view-1017

    I did google note several blogs ask the question: “Did she have a transcript” and “Was she in a set up with Obama” but that is not what you affirm.

    Do you have a link to Candy saying she had the transcript in front of her…. why that would even matter one way or the other … or is your post breaking news from the Occult?

    • MikeN says:

      Nope, just a link to EW saying that Candy said it. The videos appear complete, and it doesn’t look like she said it. I’ve asked EW for a correction.

      • bobbo, the pragmatic existential evangelical anti-theist says:

        Looks like you were sucker punched.

        How often will you let “a source” do that to you?

        The reality is….. the moderators should have a wealth of reference material immediately available to them to fact check what is said in real time. Too much lying going on as moderators/reporters/infotainers hardly do this at all. We see the results.

        Like EW–if the fact checkers get their facts wrong, they lose credibility and viewership.

        Is all a process. Beginning, middle, end==often whether we can identify those points or not.

  5. MikeN says:

    I’m reliably informed that you can get your money into InTrade in one day and not 5 like I thought if you use a brokerage account. Go now, before Obama wipes the floor with Romney on Monday at the debate! He’s trading at 60%, which is his low for the year. Peak value right now!