huma_abedin_bill_clinton_anthony_weiner-jpg



  1. Hmeyers says:

    Strangest election ever.

    Odds of Anthony Weiner playing major role in election is crazy.

    • jpfitz says:

      This insanely, entertaining, election cycle of 2016 Will unfortunately be made into a Hollywood movie. Arh.

      The FBI will never be seen the same after Comey’s decisions in the past year.

  2. Jimbo says:

    The Saudis must be PISSED! Losing a sleeper agent this close to the election.

  3. Hendrick says:

    I agree with Hillary that the FBI should tell us what they know, but supposedly they have to comb through 650 Thousand emails that Huma claims she’s already turned over. So that’s not going to happen.

    It’s time for Hillary to step aside. It’s obvious to all but the walking dead that she cannot be trusted with secure information.

  4. Bernie says:

    I saw a Clinton apologist on CNN earlier trying to pin this on the Russians! The host didn’t even interrupt him. Walking Dead is right.

  5. bobbo, the pragmatic existential evangelical anti-theist says:

    Pic of the Day: One of these things is not like the other

    I give up. What is it? All three are corrupt.

    • Hendrick says:

      Seriously? Think about it.

      • bobbo, the pragmatic existential evangelical anti-theist says:

        Actually…….as more than 38 different distinct “odd one out” facts are immediately apparent, one would have to be a complete dolt not to see the humor presented.

        Of course…. you two posted.

  6. NewFormatSux says:

    Bill Clinton is the one who is currently married.
    Anthony is the only one who is not holed up in New York too embarrassed to show his face in public.

  7. Oscar Mayer says:

    Only one no longer has a misbehaving weiner in their pants.

  8. NewFormatSux says:

    The lamp?

  9. Mr Diesel - Libertarian Deplorable says:

    My favorite headline?

    Happy Hollow Weiner

  10. NewFormatSux says:

    Bill didn’t perform the wedding did he?

  11. NewFormatSux says:

    I thought this would be a minor story, but now we see that longtime Democratic supporters are abandoning Hillary. This guy was supporting her strongly on Hannity after the story broke then changed his mind over the weekend.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/10/doug_schoen_puts_his_support_for_hillary_on_hold.html

  12. Phydeau says:

    Dream on, guys. 😀

  13. Likes2LOL says:

    Did Bill have a fling with Huma before “giving the bride away” to Anthony?

    Or, is Anthony misbehaving because he’s pissed at being cuckolded after Bill, Hillary and Huma became a steady ménage à trois?

    This story keeps getting weirder and weirder…

    • Phydeau says:

      The speculation in wingnut world is becoming weirder and weirder… y’all are going off the deep end! Fun to watch until some wingnut with a gun gets serious…

      • Bob says:

        You’re slipping Fauxdeau, you forgot to use the terms racist, vast right wing conspiracy, and of course RUSSIANS!

        I have seen you do better.

      • Bob says:

        Phydeau, how do you feel about Donna Brazille feeding Crooked Hillary debate questions?

        Your party can’t win on her merits, you have to cheat. Good job Dumbos.

        • Phydeau says:

          Bob, really? You don’t think the Republicans were fed debate questions? You don’t think that goes on all the time, in both parties? Trump is being sued for child rape and is going to court for fraud over his Trump “university” and this is the best you can come up with? Really?

          • Bob says:

            Just a whiny little bitch. Your candidate was fed debate questions. Its the only way she can win.

            Desperation.

      • Bob says:

        So why dont you answer Phydeau? Will The DNC doc your pay?

  14. Mr Diesel - Libertarian Deplorable says:

    The Wiener the World Awaited

  15. Hmeyers says:

    Phydeau is right. She’s still going to the win the election.

    This gross election has only one thing:

    America finally got the type of candidates it’s lazy, obese and unintelligent people deserve.

  16. bobbo, the pragmatic existential evangelical anti-theist says:

    Both candidates are corrupt.

    Both parties are corrupt.

    Both political theories are corrupt.

    The system is corrupt.

    Whats important kiddies is not to put your party themed blinkers on but rather look at the actual laws and policies your candidate might actually push for or fight against. How would those policies if enacted ACTUALLY AFFECT YOU. Thats: YOU….not some BS childish notion of philosophy you think you believe.

    Actually, I’m just seconding Hmeyers…via my own thought of the moment.

    • ± says:

      Why not come out and just say people should vote their own self interests? You’ve never been bashful about saying it before.

      • bobbo, the pragmatic existential evangelical anti-theist says:

        Thats just what I did say.

        What robots you wingnuts are.

        • ± says:

          Yes you said it in your verbose, abstruse style, instead of the single sentence necessary.

          And your selfish method of deciding who to hire is already used by most of the electorate; that is how you all created the failing R/D hegemony.

          And what is “wingnut”? I got it that it is some sort of ad hominem insult from the context, but what does it mean?

  17. Phydeau says:

    The system is corrupt, so how do we fix it? Get money out of politics is a huge step. So why are the Republicans so dead-set against it? The Democrats are the ones working to clean things up.

    Why does your Republican party want to keep things corrupt? Think about that when you vote.

    • Bob says:

      Hillary takes pay for play money from every terrorist nation in the world. You’re beyond an idiot.

      • Phydeau says:

        Avoiding the question, Bob. All politicians suck up to money people nowadays because that’s how the game is played. Why do Republicans want to keep the game this way and Democrats don’t?

        Answer the question, pal.

        • Bob says:

          1. Trump is not a politician

          2. He has not taken pay for play money from any terrorist countries.

          3. WTF are you talking about?

    • Tim says:

      The Clinton’s are the worst offenders when you are talking about money in politics.

      Saying Democrats trying to clean it up shows that you either are the dumbest person to ever own a computer, or your a paid shill.

  18. Phydeau says:

    Well looky here… speaking of corruption. Looks like a computer in the Trump organization has a super-secret connection to a Russian bank, Alfa Bank:

    http://slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/10/was_a_server_registered_to_the_trump_organization_communicating_with_russia.html

    Earlier this month, the group of computer scientists passed the logs to Paul Vixie. In the world of DNS experts, there’s no higher authority. Vixie wrote central strands of the DNS code that makes the internet work. After studying the logs, he concluded, “The parties were communicating in a secretive fashion. The operative word is secretive. This is more akin to what criminal syndicates do if they are putting together a project.” Put differently, the logs suggested that Trump and Alfa had configured something like a digital hotline connecting the two entities, shutting out the rest of the world, and designed to obscure its own existence. Over the summer, the scientists observed the communications trail from a distance.

    Now why would an American businessman have such a super-secret connection to a Russian bank? What is Trump hiding? Why won’t he release his tax records?

    This is the guy you want as president? Really?

    • Phydeau says:

      Another interesting tidbit from the article:

      Tea Leaves and his colleagues plotted the data from the logs on a timeline. What it illustrated was suggestive: The conversation between the Trump and Alfa servers appeared to follow the contours of political happenings in the United States. “At election-related moments, the traffic peaked,” according to Camp. There were considerably more DNS lookups, for instance, during the two conventions.

      So someone in the Trump organization is chatting with Russians about election-related events?

      This is the guy you want as president? Really?

      • Bob says:

        Har…Slate.

        FIVE separate FBI cases are probing virtually every one of Clinton’s inner circle and their families

        Read more: http://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3889994/Influence-peddling-acting-Putin-s-ally-hiding-classified-secrets-sexting-FIVE-separate-FBI-cases-probing-virtually-one-Clinton-s-inner-circle-families.html#ixzz4OljIM0Kv
        Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

        • Phydeau says:

          Bring it on, Bob. Y’all have been investigating the Clintons for decades, proclaiming how corrupt they are and that any day now they’ll be caught. Nothing so far. They’re not saints, they’re politicians and as such a little sleazy like all politicians. But not on the same level as Trump.

          • Bob says:

            NYT: Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia

            Again you’ve been discredited, this isn’t even fun anymore.

            http://nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html?_r=0

          • Phydeau says:

            From your article:

            But the F.B.I. ultimately concluded that there could be an innocuous explanation, like a marketing email or spam, for the computer contacts.

            The FBI didn’t explain why the number of contacts consistently increased around the time of significant campaign events, like the conventions. So yeah, they “doubt” it.

            Funny how you’re so ready to believe the FBI when it says things you agree with. And when it doesn’t (Clinton not guilty on classified info) you’re quick to accuse the FBI of selling out. 🙄

          • Bob says:

            “Funny how you’re so ready to believe the FBI when it says things you agree with. ”

            No one believed Comey (not even Comey apparently), when he said he didn’t have enough evidence to bring charges…..except for morons like you.

            What’s funny is how you believe wild conspiracy theories when they suit your narrative.

          • NewFormatSux says:

            That chart does not line up with the description of increased chatter around significant campaign events. Take a look and see if that makes sense.

    • NewFormatSux says:

      Everything described there, sounds like what a hacker would do:
      Configured something like a digital hotline connecting the two entities, shutting out the rest of the world, and designed to obscure its own existence.

      How did these scientists get their hands on these communications?

      • Phydeau says:

        Because no disguise is perfect… read the original Slate article to see how the security experts stumbled upon it.

        • Tim says:

          Washington Post lists Slate as the leftmost media publication that exists. Go ahead and read it, its a real eye-roller.

  19. Bob says:

    Sucks to be Phydeau:

    Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

    http://nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

    Where was that reported on Slut? Hmmm, what? It wasn’t? POOOOTINNN!

  20. Bob says:

    Woohoo! Nice haul eh Phydeau! Get the money out of politics eh Fido?

    Hillary’s Two Official Favors To Morocco Resulted In $28 Million For Clinton Foundation

    http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/31/hillarys-two-official-favors-to-morocco-resulted-in-28-million-for-clinton-foundation/#ixzz4OnrvNyLS

    Keep posting Phydeau, for every one you have on Trump I will have One hundred on the Clinton Crime Syndicate. And, unlike you, I do this for free.

  21. Dip Stick says:

    That pic is PRICELESS! ILMAO!

    … No really! President “Pussy Chaser” ties the knot between Mister “Dick Pic” and Huma Abedin. I wonder if there were CIGARS after the ceremony. It could be why Huma decided to try and sabotage Hillary’s campaign.

  22. bobbo, the pragmatic existential evangelical anti-theist says:

    As bad as the whole campaign has been from start to now…in just the last day and looks like it will continue, lots of substantive DIRT is coming out on both candidates. The Clintons use power to gain money to gain more power to gain more money. I think it started with Hillary, but Slick Willy quick on the uptake, and now with Daughter Chelsea.

    I’ve posted it before: I think “the worst” case for the Clinton is they lie, cheat, steal ONE BILLION DOLLARS for themselves. Pretty bad. But………………………… Trump is worse. He will cost the economy 4 Trillion dollars in tax breaks to his ilk in order for himself to gain a few more 100’s of millions of dollars. Thats just the economic/tax policies. What he will do on every other policy is TOTALLY UNKNOWN. I like what Chelsea Handler said last night on Real Time with Bill Maher: “I don’t trust a person who doesn’t drink.” ….its ok if you used to have a problem and are now on the wagon…. but to avoid such experiences throughout your whole life is a red flag. I think that is true…. in a vacuum of stalwart behavior to contraindicate that.

    In the Main what we have is: Hillary = corrupt and self seeking. Trump = Fantasist Nut Ball. The choice: is clear.

    • NewFormatSux says:

      When you have a candidate who drinks and one who doesn’t, isn’t the non-drinker the safer choice? The effects of alcohol on thinking, what if it happens at a dangerous time? Who’s going to protect us from drunk-nuking?

      • bobbo, the pragmatic existential evangelical anti-theist says:

        NFS—really. Look. At how you “think.” No subtlety at all. No nusance. Its 100% bumpersticker labelling all the way down.

        Most characteristics fall on a continuum. Most pedants, shills, operatives, talking heads, leaders, partisans, liars, ..etc talk and characterize at the extremes.

        The opposite of NEVER drank is indeed ALWAYS DRUNK. Not the issue at all. OF COURSE: anyone who is always drunk is not to be trusted. Its not mentioned, as they are always drunk… too drunk to run for office.

        Now—-TRY FOR JUST ONE FUCKING ONCE to imagine all that area in the middle.

        Can you do that spunky?


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 13739 access attempts in the last 7 days.