Democrats are just too stupid to use email. The reason Trump is President Elect is because Podesta used p@assw0rd for his email password. But only the Russians are smart enough to figure that out. Putin personally was involved. Putin said “Try p@ssw0rd” and it worked. And Obama somehow knows this and that’s why he expelled the Russian ambassadors.

On the verge of the Trump Apocalypse Obama has to prove Democrats are as stupid and dishonest as Republicans.

Is there anyone who isn’t disgusted by this?



  1. Scott says:

    Very funny! (BTW, it would be easier to read withut the typos.)

    • IM78 says:

      Yeah, always a good idea to reed what you want to post before you hit the enter key.

      • NewFormatSux says:

        Have the typos been fixed? I don’t see any.
        Password wasn’t password, but p@ssw0rd.

        • ± says:

          There were. Fixed. 😎

        • Marc Perkel says:

          There were no typos.

          • ± says:

            There were at least two words that were wrong and now they are fixed. They were spelled correctly but totally not the words you apparently meant. Now they are fixed. The most gracious possible label that can be ascribed to your denial is pedantry. WTF?!

          • bobbo, we think with words and flower with ideas says:

            I’m confused. Were they typos or not?

            I’ve never noticed Perkel “lie”….. so….I’m assuming “no typos.”

            If the issue is various iterations of password/p@assword…. then it could come down to what was meant to be said?

            (bobbonote: I see this is an early issue in the thread my brower hooked me to. Still a live issue I suppose?)

          • MikeN says:

            Bobbo, reading comprehension…

            I don’t know what changes were made, but it is clear from context that the reference to typos was separate from ‘password’ and there were changes made that did not involve the spelling of words, but changes of words.

  2. ECA says:

    I love the logic of Finger pointing..

  3. NewFormatSux says:

    So Marc, would your super duper spam filter have stopped the Podesta e-mail?

    Don’t blame Podesta. The crack IT staff gave him the password, AND they verified the phishing e-mail as legit. Now he claims he meant to say not legit, but even then he told him to change his password, which is exactly what is described in the e-mail. It’s saying something when you have more security with Hillary, who is unable to use anything with a password.

    Now, when is Obama going to retaliate against the Chinese for their hacking? He could blow up one of their artificial islands.

    • Jonesy says:

      “The crack IT staff gave him the password”

      I think you mean “on crack” IT staff.

    • Marc Perkel says:

      Actually phishing doesn’t get through my filter.

      • ± says:

        My company just signed on with your service after using SpamSoap with satisfactory results for 7 years. SpamSoap is closing down and I gave your link http://junkemailfilter.com to my IT guy to throw into the mix of who he was evaluating to replace them. Weeks later he selected your company, I forget why, but I trust him to make good decisions so et voilà. We went live on Saturday. After an appropriate amount of time passes, I hope to report positive results back here.

  4. NewFormatSux says:

    Marc, you ignore all the evidence of Russian hacking. For example, it is well known that Russian keyboards have an “@” on them.

  5. NewFormatSux says:

    Julian Assange should have watched The Dark Knight.

    “You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain.”

  6. Say the secret word says:

    He had no choice. He already used password, pissword, and pussword.

    Try: drowssap

    Error code: ID10T

  7. Ah_Yea says:

    For Marc, and anyone else who wants the truth.

    This is the guy who received the leaked emails:
    http://tinyurl.com/jcq9nc2

    And this is the guy who leaked the emails and why, “…disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.’”

    http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-seth-rich-leaked-clinton-emails/

    More truth in these two articles than all the U.S. media.

    • Marc Perkel says:

      Yeah – that’s what I think is likely.

      • MikeN says:

        So you are like Henry Burton in Primary Colors, who supports the Clinton(Jack Stanton) running for President even though you know he committed murder.

    • Jonesy says:

      Agreed. Add him to the Clinton body count.

    • Ah_Yea says:

      Time to start a dead pool. I give 6 months before a “mysterious accident”.

    • Phydeau says:

      As I mentioned in the other thread, yournewswire.com is another fake news site.

      http://www.snopes.com/tag/yournewswire-com/

      Including a story about Russian troops massed on the US borders.

      Really? You guys are so gullible. 🙄

      • pedro says:

        You’re a fake person so your posts are invalid

        • Phydeau says:

          Pedrito, I always salute you for your special contributions to the blog, but this one deserves special attention. Well done! 😀

          • pedro says:

            Your passive-aggressive deflections are as effective as your shilling. What a failure you are!

      • the bogeyman says:

        There is no one so gullible as he who uses snopes in an attempt to debunk something.

        • Phydeau says:

          Really, wingnuts? This is all you got? Sheesh.

        • ± says:

          Ahhh yes, another sad zealot who has had the hot poker of truth rammed up his ass by snopes.

          • pedro says:

            That’s the ingestion vector fido loves & prefers.

          • ± says:

            [to pedro]
            It’s not clear, but I think you missed that I was addressing “the bogeyman”. Or it could be me who missed that you were just exercising an opportunity to attack Phydeau for no reason.

      • MikeN says:

        And as I replied, this particularly story was true, as far as newswire is concerned. If there is ‘fake’ it starts at Wikileaks who posted the tweet. Newswire just repeated it.

  8. Hmeyers says:

    I don’t think the Democrats understand what they are doing or why.

    I think it is a recipe for disaster.

    Demographically, college educated voters and suburban voters switched from support Romney to supporting the Hillary, the first time Democrats had majorities in those voting blocks.

    They are also the most intelligent people and get turned off by temper tantrums, disgusting political theatre and ridicuous politically motivated lies.

    Right now, the Democrats current plan is to behave worse than Trump. And then whatever gains they had in college educated voters and suburban voters will evaporate.

    I like Obama and his “insult your intelligence” bullshit marathon about “The Russians hacking the election” makes me hope the door hits him in ass on the way out.

    • Ah_Yea says:

      I agree completely. They don’t know what they are doing and the leadership is so elitist that they cannot conceive that they are out of touch.

      Hence business as usual as typified by Nancy Pelosi keeping her position.

      My prediction. Trump gets 8 years, Pence gets another 8 years, and 16 years of peace and prosperity destroys the Democratic party.

      It’s not the first time, the Republican Party was born of the ashes of the Whig Party, and there are parallels to the current Democrats .

      • Hmeyers says:

        This pic summarizes my feelings ..

        http://russia.politifake.org/image/political/1612/keep-telling-was-russia-russian-hacking-politics-1482815861.jpg

        “Trump gets 8 years, Pence gets another 8 years”

        After 8 years in power, the members of that party become corrupt.

        Happens every single time.

        Right now, the Democrats are at the peak of stupid, but give them 6 years and they will be so hungry for votes they will re-learn how to appeal to voters.

      • Phydeau says:

        Well looky who showed up again. Go ahead Ah_Yea, tell us how great it is that Trump has assembled a team of billionaires, Fat Cat Republicans, and Wall Street insiders to run the country. Just like Dubya, when it drove the country into recession in less than 8 years. Tell us how great it is that he’s not even saying “drain the swamp” any more. It worked to con the rubes (i.e. you) and now he doesn’t need it any more.

        Yeah, how’s that swampy-drainy thingy working out for ya, Trumpcuck? Still worshiping the big orange cheeto? 🙄

        • pedro says:

          Oh, shut up hysteric brainwashed shill.

          • Phydeau says:

            Aw pedrito, that’s so sweet of you to stand up for your buddy!

            BTW, how’s that swampy-drainy thingy working out for you? 😉

          • pedro says:

            Just watching you bark at cars passing by makes it all so sweet

      • Phydeau says:

        Cat got your tongue, Ah-Yea? 🙄

        • Tom says:

          What the eff is wrong with you? Do you enjoy being a total dick?

          • Phydeau says:

            You new around here, Tom? Haven’t seen the sh*t slung at me? I’m just one against many. And I just asked a simple question: How does Ah_Yea feel about Trump now, based on the people he’s hired to run the country? Y’all were such big Trump fans until he actually got elected. Now it’s pretty quiet. How come?

          • Phydeau says:

            But hey, if your sensitive little feelings are hurt my my mean words, just say so. Boo hoo. Doesn’t feel so good when you’re on the receiving end, does it? In that sense y’all are like your hero Trump: Cowardly. You can dish it out but you can’t take it. Run back to your wingnut websites where everyone agrees with you. 🙄

          • Tom says:

            No, I’m not new around here. With a few exceptions, most people here treat you calmly and with respect. You should give it a try.

            Also, stop assuming that everyone who doesn’t agree with you, or didn’t vote for Hillary is a Trump supporter.

          • ± says:

            [to Tom]
            Phydeau, bobbo, and most liberals like to use the word “wingnut” on people to describe people who don’t agree with them. When they don’t agree with someone else, the appellation they use is “racist”.

            And it is absolutely correct that Phydeau assumes that any voter who didn’t vote for his lying, treasonous, felonious cunt, had to vote for Trump.

          • bobbo, we think with words and flower with ideas says:

            I might be wrong, or slip on occasion, but I certainly draw lines between wingnuts, right leaning, conservatives, republicans, the religious, and those who are criminally insane.

            My Venn Diagrams do have lots of overlap though.

    • MikeN says:

      Trump ended up winning college voters. Not sure about suburban. I suspect if they reran the election he would win both groups easily as more Republicans ‘come home’ after seeing him not go crazy after election day.

      • Hmeyers says:

        As someone who sees both parties as potentially corrupt — I’d like to see the Democrats figure out a healthy and positive agenda.

        Obamacare hasn’t worked, it is expensive with high deductibles. And has caused the price of health insurance and Medicare to go up quite a bit.

        There have been certain good things about Obamacare, like requiring health insurance to cover children to age 26.

        It used to be health insurance didn’t cover kids in college or kids still living at home with a job, which was rather stupid.

        • bobbo, we think with words and flower with ideas says:

          HM: please define “potentially” as I add another circle to my Venn Diagram. (Of note….I see you have less overlap than all too many here.)

        • MikeN says:

          26 year olds are not ‘children’. They can get their own insurance. The only reason this isn’t more of an issue is that the total expense is pretty low. My cost from 18-26 on health care was about $10 for some cold medicine.

          • bobbo, we think with words and flower with ideas says:

            They can get their own insurance: “if they have a job.” so… a bit of social engineering, or a reaction to it.

            this like SO MANY other issues: I have my own preference and analysis but am not upset if others even a majority of people disagree and the law is made the other way.

            I suppose it cuts when liberty and property are actually taken away rather than preferences and missed expectations are only involved.

            IOW: what is it to you or me if adult children are or are not included in such insurance policies?…….. just writing that and reflecting on what you posted…seems like a good idea to encourge the low cost sector of the health insured to actually get on a policy rather than go bare.

            I assume then its the good common sense and economics of it all that causes you to comment?

            …………….. and yes, you are already at the center of several Venn Circles.

          • Tom says:

            According to the Obama administration Unemployment is at 4.6%, a record low. So how can you claim that the kiddies aren’t working with numbers like that.

            I know why….but do you?

          • bobbo, we think with words and flower with ideas says:

            Walmart.

          • MikeN says:

            You have to go to definition #4 before ‘adult children’ is valid. I don’t have an issue with people providing policies that cover ‘adult children’. I was probably covered myself for awhile. I do have a problem with saying this is the only type of policy that can be sold.

          • The Mick says:

            Just let them join the military for a few years. That’s how a lot of us survived the tough times. 3 hots and a cot, and they just might learn something useful., and best of all……FREE Health Care. FREEEEEEEEE!!!!!

            No trophies, coloring books safe spaces or puppies will be provided however.

        • IM78 says:

          Seems like common sense to me. So please explain what was rather stupid about it.

          • bobbo, we think with words and flower with ideas says:

            Just what HM said: NO COVERAGE. The bulk of insurance being “group” and those groups being employed people with an Employer who offered the benefit. Yes…private insurance one on one was available, but was NOT the “market.”

  9. Maratin says:

    Well said, very well said.

  10. Phydeau says:

    Spare me the claims that you hate D’s and R’s equally. You foam at the mouth over the imagined faults of Clinton, and ignore the many real faults of Trump.

    If you were really impartial, you’d be crucifying Trump right now for making all kinds of promises about “draining the swamp” and then hiring the billionaires, fat cats, and Wall Street insiders that he has to run the country. But you’re not. You’re still calling Clinton vile names, even after she lost.

    You’re Trumpcucks, and you’re too cowardly to admit it. You’re chickensh*t wingnuts.

    • Phydeau says:

      And by all means, condemn me for the tone of my message. That’ll help you distract yourself from what I’m saying. Because y’all have been so nice when talking about Obama and Clinton and other Democrats.

      BWAHAHAHAHA!

    • MikeN says:

      Anger leads to hate, hate leads to the Dark Side.

      Then again, Anakin Skywalker joined the Dark Side for their promises of government health care(patient died).

    • ± says:

      [to Phydeaux]
      Even though Trump is currently on record for a higher ‘lies-in-general’ count than Clinton, he hasn’t shown himself to be a traitor or felon as Clinton has done (even thru the filter of her protective press).

      You’re comparing what is known about Clinton to what is not (yet?) known about Trump. This ploy is another typical liberal lie. Marc admitted voting for your lying, felonious, traitorous ÇÙÑŤ already. Sheesh.

      This is another page out of the liberal playbook; ‘don’t agree with me, then you must be’ :

      ******* issued forth Phyeaux with extreme prejudice *******
      “You’re Trumpcucks, and you’re too cowardly to admit it. You’re chickensh*t wingnuts.
      *********************************************************

      Declared Phydeau, Marc is a “wingnut”. As was pointed out elsewhere in this thread, anyone who doesn’t sufficiently agree with a liberal is a “wingnut” by default.

      • MikeN says:

        “If you are not with me, then you are my enemy.”
        Anakin Skywalker

  11. bobbo, we think with words and flower with ideas says:

    To any and all, but perhaps Phydeaux as he is one of the few that will answer a direct question: What is this thread about? (anyway??)

    I was going to go off topic and ask what progress Trump has indicated he will do to overturn Obamacare. I have to ask as my cable contract terminated and I’ve been without news for a month now. Another month to go before I can sign back on as a new customer and save $300 year…and I can watch all the shows archived that I haven’t watched so far. The news snippets I have gotten have been too sparse….I have the hazy picture that Trump really doesn’t care much either way, personally he would lean in keeping Obamacare as he has said no change to Medicare and Soc Security. BUT…he wants to keep his inner circle of appointments happy, and I think he will sign whatever Obamacare killing legislation comes his way even as it can’t make any sense on its face. Last I heard, the Pukes (therefor Trump) want to keep all the good aspects of O-care (the coverage) but cancel all the bad aspects (ie actually pay for it by mandating coverage pools and so forth). IE==another huge demonstration of Puke Magical Thinking….. like all their tax cuts and promises of new jobs. All Pure BS.

    But, I thought that actually is off topic, so I re-read the OP as 99% of the time, no response actually answers the question posed or responds to the issues raised.

    I have to admit, I don’t know what Perkel means to say. Each sentence makes sense in isolation, but the entire OP summed up is a mess. I note the funny/ironic conclusion that the Russians tried to rig the election by showing it was rigged but to my knowledge the Russians didn’t show anything that wasn’t already known or actually proudly stated to be the way things work……. and yes, that would still be the Russians trying to “rig” or influence the election. The truth and the obvious can be just as big a wrench as lies and obfuscations.

    All that said….. why does Obama have to prove the Dumbos are as bad as the Pukes? Doesn’t make any sense unless I’m being to literal in the intention? What is meant is actually that “its sad” that Obama has to reveal incompetency at a Republican base level???? I thought that would only show him to be anti-Russian which before Trump was a good thing? but the flavor this election year is to be pro-Russia and anti-China????

    Maybe my overarching question really is: which kind of stupid are we supposed to be?

    • ± says:

      After mind numbing rambling to get up his word count, bobbo finally hangs the following gem out to dry:

      “Maybe my overarching question really is: which kind of stupid are we supposed to be?”

      Can’t answer that, but you seemed to have figured it out.

  12. Peppeddu says:

    That’s why we need professionals to do the news, because right now professionals are doing the FAKE news and so many people are falling for it.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 7157 access attempts in the last 7 days.