The Huffington Post

OK, so it’s not news that politicians are hypocrites. But, my goodness. This just takes the hypocritical cake. As reported by PageOneQ.com, two infamous senators have signed on to the bill of Mississippi Republican Sen. Roger Wicker to establish a constitutional amendment codifying marriage as between a man and a woman. You probably only need two guesses as to which two senators announced they were co-sponsoring the bill today — David “John” Vitter and Larry “Wide Stance” Craig. The actual wording of the amendment and the status of Vitter and Craig as co-sponsors can be seen here.

I mean, really now. How much further down the rabbit hole can we go? A man who pleaded guilty to lewd conduct in propositioning an undercover police officer for anonymous sex in a bathroom, and a man who allegedly has a diaper fetish exerting their moral authority over the rest of us. How can it have come to this? Sure, we know that the moral high ground was ceded by the far right a long time ago. It all depends just how far back you want to go. The list of disgraced fundamentalist zealots reads like a Who’s Who of giddy peccadilloes: Jimmy Swaggart, Jim Bakker, Ted Haggard and on and on. But, generally speaking, once they’ve been outed as self-loathing perverts, they try not to come down on the rest of us anymore.

Perhaps we should send a message to Vitter and Craig, because obviously, it hasn’t hit them yet: You. Do. Not. Get. To. Tell. Us. How. To. Live. Any. More. You lost the right to moralize about the same time you strapped on a pair of adult diapers and/or opened your stance a little too wide. People who moralize lead first by example. You think Ghandi ever hooked up in a men’s room?

How can people take these clowns seriously?




  1. greg allen says:

    I think a lot of conservative leaders still don’t understand that “family values conservatism” has been totally and irrevocably discredited.

  2. greg allen says:

    >> MikeN said,
    >> So are you guys going to object and put up a blog post if former Klansman Robert Byrd votes on civil rights legislation?

    If Larry Craig had been gay for about twenty minutes in his youth, your comparison would be valid.

  3. JimD says:

    Didn’t these REPUKE UNWASHED RECTUMS promise a BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT and a TERM LIMITS AMENDMENT ??? So, why, when they controlled BOTHT THE CONGRESS AND THE OVAL OFFICE DIDN’T THEY PERFORM ??? Do you think they were LYING ??? And now they whine on and on about an amendment to ban gay marriage ??? Its time to turn these LYING SACKS OF SH*T AND STEAMING TURDS OUT OF OFFICE FOR GOOD !!! ***NEVER VOTE FOR A REPUBLICAN EVER AGAIN*** !!!

  4. philladscott says:

    #18 Patrick: Not wanting to pay for health benefits or other burdens?!? Ever heard of irony? You do realize, don’t you, that because the state refuses to recognize my male partner and accord him health benefits that he is getting free health care from the state. Wait, not so free. YOUR TAXES pay for his medical checkups, blood tests, medications and any of his other needs up through and including hospital procedures, dental work and eye exams. It would be far LESS expensive for you if he were covered under my plan.

    Thank you for your contributions to our continued health and well-being.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 6839 access attempts in the last 7 days.