Sunset over Iraq

A majority of Iraq’s parliament has signed a proposed bill that would require a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. soldiers from Iraq and freeze current troop levels, a sign of a growing division between Iraqi legislators and the prime minister that mirrors the widening gulf between the Bush administration and its critics in Congress.

In both Iraq and the United States, there is deepening frustration among lawmakers and the public over President Bush’s troop buildup, a policy that has yet to prevent widespread killing in Iraq. At the same time, Bush and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki are dispatching their emissaries in an urgent transatlantic gambit to shore up support.

But as in the United States, Iraq’s lawmakers are moving further away from the views of the government, particularly on the issue of American presence in Iraq.

Bush has gone on record several times – that if the Iraqi government asks the U.S. military to leave he will pull the troops. Since he has no “official” veto power in Iraq, what new lies will we get to rationalize continuing his war?

Meanwhile, the cowards de jour, CBS, demonstrated their “independence” from government pressures by firing their military analyst, General John Batiste, for supporting VoteVets call to leave Iraq.

Appearing on MSNBC’s Countdown, Batiste, former First Infantry Division commander, tells host Keith Olbermann, “I’m no longer wearing the uniform of our country; I have no ties to the defense industry; I can speak honestly, I have a duty to do so. And I know there [are] other generals both active duty and retired that are doing all they can within their means. In my case, I’ll continue to speak out.”



  1. tallwookie says:

    about damn time

  2. sdf says:

    Bush has gone on record several times – that if the Iraqi government asks the U.S. military to leave he will pull the troops.
    Here comes the spin and lies brigade.

  3. tkane says:

    Not necessarily the onset of the lies brigade. This may be the “out” Bush is looking for. If he has any intent on leaving a more positive legacy behind him, being able to claim pull-out of Iraq because we were invited to leave would do it.

    If so, then the thing to look for will be what happens with Iran. With Chaney rattling the sabers towards them, leaving Iraq wouldn’t necessarily mean leaving the region. Please someone prove me wrong here.

  4. trat for says:

    Talk about ingratitude.
    America pays.
    Europe and Asia benefit.
    Europe and Asia dump their exports into the U.S. with the help of that oil for subsidized production.
    However if getting into far off Vietnam without knowing the real issues and the mindset is small potatoes.
    Events and issues in Iraq go all the way back to Mesopotamia.

  5. ECA says:

    4.
    and the money the GOV makes, the tarriffs, are PAID by the US citizians..
    FRomt he basic nessesity, soap, towels, clothes, tables, chairs….
    To cars, computers, games…
    Just because MANY companies DONT DO THE WORK.
    20 people on top playing golf.
    2000 working in the office,
    And those 20 on top, make MORE money then ALL 2000 in the office added together.
    No foriegn company Does it that way. Even Japan, taiwan, and CHINA know better then to PAY those on top THAT much money.

  6. John says:

    Lets see:
    VP goes to Iraq and says “Iran is Bad” at the same time Iraq and US Lawmakers are looking to set up time tables for the return of the troops to the land they have volunteered to defened.
    Many Years ago the dictator president called Iraq, Iran, N. Korea the axis of evil. So of course the next step will be bad inelegance about Iran, some magical unfounded presidential authority to override congress and attack Iran, and even more people throughout the world dead, maimed, injured and left without homes, health care, food, water and living in fear….

  7. ChrisMac says:

    When everyone hates you.. At least you know where you stand

  8. TWhat?!!!?! says:

    Freedom To Choose, and Self-Determination? No, that’s not what the USA is all about… what are you, in need of a Drug Czar?!!?!

  9. Chuck says:

    Dvorak for President!

  10. ChrisMac says:

    Can’t declare war on em if you dunno what they arrrrre

  11. Carducci says:

    “But as in the United States, Iraq’s lawmakers are moving further away from the views of the government”

    What the hell does this mean? Lawmakers are part of the government?

  12. MikeN says:

    Can’t blame you for a false post when the regular media gets it wrong. The proposal that Parliament passed was for the US to withdraw IF the Iraqis are ready to take over. But for the liberals in the media, ‘Iraqi Parliament endorses Bush policy’ wasn’t the antiwar headline they wanted.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 11237 access attempts in the last 7 days.