Perhaps this shows how low Palin’s sunk since she resigned in that even Fox isn’t willing to put up with her crap.




  1. Improbus says:

    Fox News fact checking? Next you will tell me that they are “Fair and Balanced”.

  2. robin1943 says:

    Come on Uncle Dave you guys must really be afraid of Palin as you just keep on picking any trival notes and try to warp it into something big. You guys defined the Republican party in the last election and got the candidate you wanted, McCain. Now you are continuing to try and define the Republican party so you can end up with a weak candidate in the next election. Don’t think it is going to work this time the way BO and the Dem congress is pissing off the electorate.

  3. oCoin says:

    OMG she made a mistake! Such a good catch! And OMG it was on FOX news! Wait, how could that be, it almost makes it worth watching FOX news like most of the public does because it’s fair and balanced more of the time. So what’s implied is that we should all vote for democrats simply because Alaskan women in power tend to become activists in questioning coin printing strategies.

  4. The0ne says:

    Since Palin was mentioned can someone post a link to a hot sexy picture of her? 🙂 That’s all I care about

  5. Mr Ed says:

    It is so much fun to watch Repugs and Palin specifically self-destruct.
    Why don’t they just come right out and declare themselves the selfishness party once and for all?

  6. bobbo, libertarianism fails when it becomes dogma says:

    Please let us know when one thing Palin says is right?

  7. The Warden says:

    I am waiting for the leftist bloggers on here to start fact checking Obama. I think you’ll find he tells a ton more whoppers than Sarah Palin. And Sarah isn’t destroying America like Obama is.

    In fact, Terrorist Hasan is pretty much a metaphor for what Obama is doing to America with his policies.

  8. bobbo, libertarianism fails when it becomes dogma says:

    #7–Now Warden==I’ll WAG that Obama tells more whoppers because he’s actually in charge and has to say “a lot” but that as a percentage of things said, he is in the 20% range, while Palin is in the 90% range. EVERYTHING she says is a whopper outside of anything that is irrelevant.

    Palin can do little harm because she is nothing but an unemployable housewife who twitters. But even with that, she got New York 23rd the first Dem Congressman in 150 years. Most damaging thing to the GOP I can think of==beside their voter base as a whole.

    Stay tuned for the yucks.

  9. The Warden says:

    #8.

    Palin lies 90% and Obama 20%. You have the stats to back that up or are you lying like that shifty half white scum bag Chicago Pol named Obama?

  10. The Warden says:

    IT’s sad that this blog has resorted to posting such ridiculous things. It’s ridiculous if it was Obama or any other democrat stating it but this blog has a microscope on Palin and will post anything about her. The obsession the leftist hacks have on here if amusing because while Obama sinks like the fake that he is, this blog focuses on the inane.

  11. The0ne says:

    #7
    I still can’t understand WTF Palin is talking about most of the time. It’s all gibberish and stupid talk. When she can properly put sentences together, I’ll begin to listen again. Until then, someone PLEASE remove the foot in her mouth dammit!

  12. Olo Baggins of Bywater says:

    Warden, you need to turn off Fox and get your news elsewhere…it’s rotting your logic ability.

    —btw running Win 7 on an old Dell D600. Works quite well. Very well, in fact.

  13. bobbo, libertarianism fails when it becomes dogma says:

    #9–Warden==yep, does look like brain rot is setting in. You do know what “WAG” stands for??? It means the subject is too irrelevant to invest any time in.

    Nice rap on Faux Spews as well. Its fair and balanced for them to do the work up and report on Palin but bad form for anyone else, including a general interest aggregation blog like this one, to report it????

    Haw, haw. Talk about wheels off. Sad to see someone without talking points to tether themselves to something with at least some internal consistency.

  14. badtimes says:

    C’mon, a Rasmussen poll? Haven’t we been through this already? Rasmussen always skews Republican. They are a consistent outlier.

  15. dcphill says:

    Yet another excersize in trivial persuit.
    Sarah Palin’s uterances are trivial.
    Why do we persue this crap?

  16. qb says:

    Who’s Sarah Palin?

  17. srgothard says:

    So she didn’t say that it was Obama’s administration, but she may have implied it. So we fact check what people didn’t say but may have meant now??

  18. Bastian says:

    Who are we all kidding… there is nothing more secular than money. Take anything and everything referring to God off our currency; instead, put “ In Goldman Sachs we trust” just to be very clear about it.

  19. Dallas says:

    Oh please. This is a lame attempt to snooker the Fox sheeple they actually are watching a fact checking medium.

    I don’t watch that shit. Is O’Really still foaming there?

  20. Troublemaker says:

    Frightening that this buffoon could have been our Vice President.

    Then again, we had 8 years of a similar buffoon as President and survived… kinda.

  21. right says:

    And don’t forget there are some here who think Palin will win the Presidency in a landslide in 2012. Weeeee….

  22. Poppa Boner says:

    I’d hit it!

  23. m.c. in l.v. says:

    Which god?

  24. deowll says:

    #24 The one they reader happens to believe in.

    The bigger question is will anyone use these coins. The most likely answer is no.

    I have a couple of metal dollars stashed somewhere but don’t spend them in fact I normally put everything I can on plastic which is paid off at the end of the month.

  25. Buzz says:

    Oh, lordy. Next they’ll be fact-checking Dvorak.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 10288 access attempts in the last 7 days.