Telegraph.co.uk

A true three dimensional TV that does not depend on wearing strange glasses could be demonstrated within five years. Scientists have at last started to catch up with the 3D holographic displays that have become commonplace in science fiction films. The Princess Leia figure projected by R2-D2 in Star Wars is one example of moving holograms that have been shown in a wide range of films over the decades since the invention of holography in the 1960s.

But the reality has lagged far behind and for decades relied on using glasses to feed a slightly different image to the right and left eyes, using different colored lenses or polaroid, for instance in the first film of the “golden era” of 3D movies, Bwana Devils. Now a new material that will allow an updateable palm sized 3D holographic display is described in Nature by Dr Savas Tay, Prof Nasser Peyghambarian and colleagues at the University of Arizona, Tucson, in work that raises hopes for applications in the home, defence, medicine and industry. The problem is that individual still holograms contain so much information that they require a special medium to record them and vast computing power.

Computer power is becoming cheaper all the time and there is now a way to record them digitally, using a sheet of laser light crafted by computer. The key to today’s advance is a new medium to record the holograms which is based on specially designed “photo refractive” polymers that respond to light and can be overwritten with a device called a “spatial light modulator”, unlike the media traditionally used for holography which worked like an old fashioned photographic film.

As for when he expects the first 3D TVs based on this technology to appear, he says “within two to three years.”

Of course the inevitable question is, how will this affect the pr0n industry? In a big way, to be sure. And here I am, just getting used to the idea of HDTV.




  1. B. Dog says:

    Holograms are cool.

  2. julieb says:

    Should I hold off on that 50 inch plasma?

  3. Improbus says:

    I am sure this will come out the day after I buy a big flat panel.

  4. Mark Derail says:

    Bah…easy.

    Just sandwich a bunch of LCD panels together.
    Fifty panels thick will give you a depth of fifty pixels.

    And be only a few inches thick. No fancy glasses required.

    With a foot thick, LCD panels now only 3mm thick, should be perfect.

    Since LCD panels will be dirt cheap, and bendable, in 10 years, be prepared for 3D advertising in the subway.

  5. the answer says:

    And I am sure there will be two different versions of it coming out at the same exact time.

  6. DaveW says:

    At least they will finally get rid of the red/blue glasses that don’t work. The polaroid glasses work. None of them work through conventional television, they just give you a headache.

  7. AdmFubar says:

    wait, aren we currenty buying tv’s with less of a third dimension??? (flat panel)
    soooooo we are heading back to an old style box…hhmmm

  8. Jeff says:

    Sure…

  9. OhForTheLoveOf says:

    Cool… A stupid gimmick to make the idiot box even more idiotic. Let me get my credit card….

  10. McCullough says:

    #9. I thought you’d get a kick out of this.

  11. Sying Flaucer says:

    Seriously, hasn’t this story pop up once every five years or so for the last thirty years?

  12. Angel H. Wong says:

    And 20 years after the first 3D TV is sold you’ll see 3D TV channels.

  13. TheGlobalWarmingNemesis says:

    About the time 3D is released, a competitor will announce that 4D is right around the corner.

  14. Peter iNova says:

    True Story:
    When the laser was first introduced, decade upon decade ago, holograms started appearing along with the ever-so-certain prediction that holographic movies and TV was just a few years in the future.

    Current realities:
    ALL of the glasses-free versions of 3D viewing to date have HUGE limitations of head/eye positioning.

    The principle:
    The most expensive words in any language is “All you have to do is…”

  15. GF says:

    #4, saw a non glasses 3D viewer at N.A.B. in 1997. It was created for 3D visualization and was very similar to your LCD idea except it used a parallax barrier, thus needing only 2 LCD screens.

  16. Jurjen says:

    This is already for sale! Philips makes these sets commercially already for a few years. Making enough content so people buy the sets is a bit harder; wonder if they get that in 5 years.
    http://www.business-sites.philips.com/3dsolutions/3dtechnology/Index.html

  17. JimD says:

    Well, we will have 500 3D Channels and nothing to watch !!! (Don’t get me started with that IDIOT, SIMON, who doesn’t seem to have a shirt with a collar !!!) But as the blogger suggested, pr0n will save the day !!! 3D “Money Shots”, “comming” right at you !!!

  18. jwareing says:

    I swear that 20 or 25 years ago I saw a demonstration of 3d television that worked without glasses. It was on the CBS Morning News, which means that I and 7 other people were watching.
    Am I the only person still living who saw this?


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 7133 access attempts in the last 7 days.