Ulanoff, I’m sure of it, could pass for Steve Jobs if he’d wear jeans.




  1. deowll says:

    Apple= ZZZZZZzzzzzzz

  2. Chris Mac says:

    This should be good. Like McCains in the microwave.

  3. Mackie says:

    1. Steve still looks pretty skinny to me. Big props for coming back 7 months after a liver transplant, but he looks far from good.

    2. no camera on the ipod touch? yikes!

    3. camera but not pictures on the nano? huh??

    4. Why is the classic still around? this should have been phased out – seems like a waste of resources to market it. Might as well make a fatboy iPhone that has the extra storage..

    pretty much a yawn announcement and the small drop in stock price is a reflection of the market’s take on the event: Boring… so now we shall wait for the Zune announcement.

  4. mr. show says:

    My take on the lack of the video camera on the itouch was so as not to cannibalize sales of the new iPhone from AT&T (as the iTouch can do Skype calls).

    I keep hearing about “chip problems” (which I think is bull) with incorporating the camera into the touch but wouldn’t the new iTouch be a new 3G iPhone without the telephony?

  5. jobs says:

    #3 Even though the classic sells less then the other iods it still outsells any other hard drive player on the market.

  6. JoaoPT says:

    New iPods… Yaaawwwnn….

    Seriously, I was thinking all the line, except the nano, would move to ipod touch, the classic would be replaced by a touch with HardDrive, and they would ditch the shuffle.
    IMHO the nano is the best all around iPod. Seriously, who needs 160Gb…people already have all the stuff on the desktop and on the laptop…

  7. DrunkenChainSmokerLook says:

    John, someone who looks like…

    …a shorter-hair version of Aileen Wuornos (Charlize Theron played the Floridian murderess in “Murder”)…

    …shouldn’t talk.

  8. Cursor_ says:

    Pale, thin, pallid and gaunt.

    And Jobs didn’t look very well either.

    Cursor_

  9. Somebody_Else says:

    I guess Leo was right on Twit. They brought Jobs to a crappy announcement so his return wouldn’t overwhelm anything of importance.

    The new Nano sounds pretty dumb.

  10. Rider says:

    @3

    Why is the classic still around, the real question is why would anyone buy an mp3 player that only holds 16gb, oh and you get to pay the wonderfully low price of 179$ for such a useless device.

    I want an mp3 player, not some tiny media device that takes pictures, plays games and has no space to hold any of it.

  11. Father Tomb says:

    Why not an iphone with an HD and a big battery?

    Are we beyond the ipod phase yet? How many devices do you carry around?

  12. cornholer says:

    Apple: What the Fuck? Worst episode ever!

  13. chuck says:

    Apple kinda blew it by putting the camera in the Nano, but not in the Touch.

    The odd thing is, I didn’t really think about having a camera in an iPod (ignoring the iPhone) until they stuck it in the Nano. Now I want a Touch with a camera in it.

    I have 49GB of music, so I need the 64GB Touch, which would have left room for video. But with no camera, I guess I’ll be waiting for next year’s announcement.

  14. Ron Larson says:

    Dumb question….
    Does the iPod Nano video camera also record audio? Seems a bit pointless to shoot video without the audio to go with with it. A camera would have made more sense.

  15. smaki611 says:

    ok, so my thoughts are as follows

    1) larger Ipod classic. Perfect for automobiles. I have a pioneer deck in my car, and I leave my current classic loaded with music and videos. Being able to have my whole library of both, is nice.

    2) ipod Nano — Interesting, but underwhelming. I honestly think that they are only looking at competing with the flip, but that is it. The FM tuner doesn’t make sense, if it was HD, it would be better.

    3) iPod Touch. Love the new size option, hate the fact that it doesn’t have a camera yet.

  16. Awake says:

    Nothing to announce, so they announce Steve Jobs is feeling better, and the crowd goes wild!

    Snow Leopard = Service Pack 2 = Yawn
    Variations on music players = Yawn
    An even more bloated iTunes = Ughhh
    Ringtomes… more rigntones = Pfffttt
    75000 apps = 10 useful apps = $1400 / year phone service

    And you think Obama has a “cult of personality” following? HA!

  17. zorkor says:

    #17

    couldn’t have put it better myself. 🙂

  18. Buzz says:

    Apple will sell a cubic kilometer of the videoNanos. Next year they will sell a cubic mile of the HDvideoNanos with 32/64/128 GB chips.

    Also coming: the iPhoneChat. A two-way iPhone to iPhone only video phone system.

    The coming tablet will kill Kindle.

    Buzz mega zchemega shevva.

  19. Rider says:

    @16

    Actually it’s not really a bigger iPOD classic it’s the same size as the one they stopped making last year.

  20. Carcarius says:

    Yeah, yesterday’s Apple “event” = FAIL

    I would have gotten an itouch had it been given a camera, the same one that the iPhone has, that is. I think I’ll keep waiting…

  21. zone says:

    It is obvious why the iTouch didn’t get the video camera. Look inside the agreement with ATT no use of 3G network for video, only WiFi.

    The announcement which I expect to come next will be Movie Rentals from YouTube, watch in any WiFi zone. They will be stored on the iTunes cloud, and be able to watch within a specified time

    I love No Agenda, keep Adam in Line MrCD (that’s what I call ya John C Dvorack

    Regards
    Zone

  22. jcj7161 says:

    Lance still has a JOB? God is he sucking up Macfans now?


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 10271 access attempts in the last 7 days.