Daylife/AP Photo used by permission

One of Rupert Murdoch’s most senior European executives has resigned following Guardian inquiries about a circulation scam at News Corporation’s flagship newspaper, the Wall Street Journal.

The Guardian found evidence that the Journal had been channelling money through European companies in order to secretly buy thousands of copies of its own paper at a knock-down rate, misleading readers and advertisers about the Journal’s true circulation.

The bizarre scheme included a formal, written contract in which the Journal persuaded one company to co-operate by agreeing to publish articles that promoted its activities, a move which led some staff to accuse the paper’s management of violating journalistic ethics and jeopardising its treasured reputation for editorial quality.

Internal emails and documents suggest the scam was promoted by Andrew Langhoff, the European managing director of the Journal’s parent company, Dow Jones and Co, which was bought by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation in July 2007. Langhoff resigned on Tuesday.

The highly controversial activities were organised in London and focused on the Journal’s European edition, which circulates in the EU, Russia, and Africa. Senior executives in New York, including Murdoch’s right-hand man, Les Hinton, were alerted to the problems last year by an internal whistleblower and apparently chose to take no action. The whistleblower was then made redundant

Zombie subscribers to the once-proud Wall Street Journal.



  1. Richard says:

    I’m glad holding up that high ethical standard that we now see on Wallstreet.

  2. jbenson2 says:

    And we are supposed to be surprised?
    Welcome to Marketing 101.

    • Dallas says:

      You call this marketing 101?

      What corrupt on-line business school did you dual into?

  3. Drive By Poster says:

    The whole news media lies like crazy. Mainly about being unbiased and impartial in the coverage of the news.

    Most big city news media outlets are blatantly biased to the Left. No surprise, really, as big cities usually have populations whose politics bias to the Left and leaning Left helps keep the news media outlet in business on its home turf. The LIE comes from the such news media outlets claiming repeatedly that they don’t skew Left.

    They show their bias by what they do and do not cover. By how much they cover what they do cover (duration and frequency). By how the frame/spin/phrase what they cover. By what they include and leave out in what they cover (1 critical fact can completely change the conclusions drawn from a story). By what conclusions they embed in what they cover. By the intonation of their voice in TV and radio. By their body language and facial expression on TV. By the headline/tagline they give the story. By where they place the story in their news layout/lineup. And finally(?), when they cover it (1 AM, 34 days after the event became known, etc).

  4. Mr Ed - the Imitation (accept no original) says:

    Murdoch lied?

    NNOOOOOoooooooo…..

  5. msbpodcast says:

    I live in (or right across the Hudson from) NYC and Wall Street (where I used to work.)

    Where is this left leaning media you speak of?

    Bloomberg is definitely not left leaning.

    Fox news, the remainder of the print media and most of the news I get around town is definitely not left leaning.

    If I want to find any lefties I have to get on the net and look for ’em.

    Like I said, where is this left leaning media you speak of?

    What channel are they on?

    Where are they printed?

    If you’re going to make an accusation, make it stick or STFU…

  6. Dallas says:

    The Murdoch media empire is a gross business of manipulating sheeple thinking to the highest bidder or the whims of Murdoch himself.

    The guy is smart in knowing you don’t fight people who buy ink by the barrel.

  7. sargasso_c says:

    Whistleblowers. Has anyone ever wanted to be one? “Daddy, when I grow up I want to destroy the life’s work of thousands of honest hard working journalists with an impromptu and morally dubious act of (profitable) moral piousness”

  8. Glenn E. says:

    I like how so many News Corp executives willingly fall on their swords, to protect old Rupert. Who will never be blamed for doing anything wrong. Or for knowing about anything wrong going on, in his business empire.

  9. boutros boutros says:

    I can always tell an Eitard post by the title

  10. Olo Baggins of Bywater says:

    The background of the structure of News Corp tends to explain much of their trouble. It’s not a normal corporation, run in the normal way.

  11. Buzz Mega says:

    If you are in a certain group of influential individuals in major cities in this land and have a cell phone, blackberry or computer, Rupert is looking over your shoulder, right now.

    Murdoch IS Big Brother.

  12. JimD says:

    You know, when the Conservatives took over the Journal, they had to lower the Reading Level from post-graduate to 8th grade level so that Conservatives could understand it !!! And now with Conservatives attacking public education everywhere, they may have to resort to casting the “news” as Bible Verses !!!


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 10077 access attempts in the last 7 days.