New Zealand’s brain injury charity says it didn’t mean to cause offence by planning a “zombie walk” to raise money for victims of brain damage.

The charity and the event’s organisers have come under fire after inviting participants to dress up and “channel their inner zombie”, declaring “seeing zombies have been eating brains all these years, we figured it’s time we gave back”. The highlight of the fundraiser, to be held in Rotorua later this month, will be a “flash mob” zombie dance to the tune of Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” down the main street.

Both broadcaster TVNZ and Rotorua’s Daily Post newspaper say they have received complaints from people with brain injuries, saying they were “horrified” at being linked to shuffling corpses returned from the grave. Discussion forums on the Trade Me website are also riddled with criticism of the event.

But Brain Injury New Zealand president John Clough said no offence was intended and they certainly were not likening brain injury patients to the undead.

“The zombie is a fictional character in horror movies that does not exist,” Clough said.

“The organisers have just tried to capture people’s imaginations to raise money, not to offend anyone. It’s very hard to convince people to part with their hard-earned cash and this is just one way of getting attention,” Clough said.

Never look a gift horse in the mouth…or a zombie in the eye.


He is an idle, pea-brained glutton with a permanent craving for doughnuts and Duff beer, but Homer Simpson has been declared a true Catholic by the Vatican’s official newspaper.

The newspaper acknowledged that Homer snores through the sermons of the Reverend Lovejoy and inflicts “never-ending humiliation” on his evangelical neighbour, Ned Flanders. But in an article headlined “Homer and Bart are Catholics”, the newspaper said: “The Simpsons are among the few TV programmes for children in which Christian faith, religion, and questions about God are recurrent themes…”

It quoted an analysis by a Jesuit priest, Father Francesco Occhetta, of a 2005 episode of The Simpsons, The Father, the Son and the Holy Guest Star, which revolved around Catholicism and was aired a few weeks after the death of Pope John Paul II…The episode touches on issues such as religious conflict, interfaith dialogue, homosexuality and stem cell research.

“Few people know it, and he does everything he can to hide it, but it is true: Homer J Simpson is a Catholic,” insists L’Osservatore Romano.

Har!

What do you think? Does Homer fit into Catholicism?



Courtney Winkels blows bubbles, much to the consternation of Officer Adam Josephs, sunglasses, who threatens to arrest her for assault..

When he first saw a video of a Toronto constable threatening to arrest a G20 protester for blowing bubbles, one YouTube user was so livid, he couldn’t stop writing comments.

In fact, the man, who uses the alias “theforcebewithme,” can’t even remember writing the specific comment that now has him defending a $1.2 million defamation lawsuit launched by Toronto’s now notorious “Officer Bubbles.” Const. Adam Josephs seeks to compel the Google-owned YouTube to reveal the identity of the person who created and posted the videos as well as any information it has on the 24 other users who made allegedly defamatory remarks. Josephs’ lawsuit isn’t targeting the video that sparked his infamy, but a collection of eight cartoons posted to the popular video website that show a police officer resembling Josephs engaging in abusive acts of power.

The animations depict an officer named “A. Josephs” arresting a variety of people — from Santa Claus to U.S. President Barack Obama — as well as punching a news photographer. In his statement of claim, Josephs calls the cartoons and several comments “devastatingly defamatory,” alleging they have brought him “ridicule, scandal and contempt both personally and as a member of the (Toronto Police Service).” He claims the animations have also resulted in threats against him and his family.

No comment. Har!


Why do I get the feeling that the US is becoming more like the mafia every day? Without having to worry about Federal RICO and other laws, of course.

Congress will pass a bill to “forgive” banks the potentially criminal errors made in foreclosure proceedings, a senior CNBC editor predicts.

In a blog column Friday, John Carney argues that lawmakers in DC won’t allow the country’s largest issuers of mortgages to suffer financial losses following revelations of numerous mishandled foreclosure proceedings, especially when bailing them out this time “won’t cost taxpayers a dime.”

Here’s what is going to happen: Congress will pass a law called something like “The Financial Modernization and Stability Act of 2010” that will retroactively grant mortgage pools the rights in the underlying mortgages that people are worried about. All the screwed up paperwork, lost notes, unassigned security interests will be forgiven by a legislative act….

The [foreclosure] crisis is not driven by economics. It is driven by legal rights. And there’s simply zero probability that the politicians in Washington are going to let Bank of America or Citigroup or JP Morgan Chase fail because of a legal issue.

Carney predicts that the lame-duck session of Congress following this November’s elections will pass the law. “Every member of Congress … who has been voted out of office will cast a vote for the bill. And the President will sign it.”



This Episode’s Executive Producer: Ernie Ernst
This Episode’s Executive Producer: Zachary Geesaman
Executive Producer: Janice Kang
Knighthoods: Dennis Cruise
Art By: Nick the Rat

Sign up for No Agenda Show Newsletter signup here.

Donate to show here or here.

No Agenda Survey Results

Listen to show by clicking ►

Direct link to show.
Show Notes here.
Show forum here.

Sign up for No Agenda Show Newsletter signup here.




Click pic to embiggen


We spent the Cold War in perpetual fear that the U.S. and U.S.S.R. would start an intentional nuclear conflict. The truth is, we came far closer to blowing ourselves up with nuclear weapons than we ever came to WWIII. […] There are actually dozens of instances like these, but here are five major ones that happened in the U.S. If we were to consider Soviet activity, the list could go on for hours.

Here are two of the more interesting comments from the piece:

The worst was still to come. Several days later, rescue crews found the third operator. He had been standing atop the reactor when the incident occurred, and the force of the explosion had blasted a control rod up and through his chest, pinning him to the ceiling.

An honorable mention goes to the Duluth bear, in which a guard saw a bear climbing a fence at an Air Force base and rang an alarm. The alarm connected to other nearby bases, but one of them was wired wrong, so instead of “intruder alert!” they got the “Nuke Russia Now!” alarm. Nuclear armed jets were on the runways ready to take off before the mistake was rectified.

If that doesn’t seem scary enough, there are dozens more incidents like these on the U.S. side alone. We haven’t even touched on the Cuban Missile Crisis. The sad lesson is that we have less to fear from naked aggression than we do from incompetence and bad engineering.

I have this odd feeling we haven’t yet overcome that problem in a whole lotta areas.


From the Winston-Salem Journal comes this charming story about an elderly fellow, Bill Johnson, who has discovered the image of Jesus in a tree limb that fell in his front yard. He believes it to be a “robed image of Jesus with an outstretched hand. The head is near the center of the limb where the rings of the tree are lighter, giving an almost halo appearance.”

And he’s milked this observation in newspapers and TV… but seriously. Halo, or no halo, that’s not Jesus.

That’s a Dalek.

The two differ in a number of ways. One is the saviour of the world, the Son of God, who died and is risen and will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead. And the other is a mutated Kaled life form from Skaro, bred to believe in its own genetic superiority with a desire to destroy everything else in existence, and a propensity to scream “Exterminate”.

You can work out which is which yourself.


Benoît B. Mandelbrot, a maverick mathematician who developed an innovative theory of roughness and applied it to physics, biology, finance and many other fields, died on Thursday in Cambridge, Mass. He was 85.

Dr. Mandelbrot coined the term “fractal” to refer to a new class of mathematical shapes whose uneven contours could mimic the irregularities found in nature.

And the fractal of all this? We’re all going to die! Damn, I seriously wanted to meet this guy.


Stepping up the Obama administration’s opposition to Proposition 19, the nation’s top law enforcement official promised to “vigorously enforce” federal drug laws against Californians who grow or sell marijuana for recreational use even if voters pass the legalization measure.

U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric Holder’s response to the initiative comes as the administration has been under pressure to campaign against it more forcefully. Last week, Mexico’s president, Felipe Calderon, chided the Obama administration for not doing enough to defeat it. And last month, nine former heads of the Drug Enforcement Administration publicly urged Holder to speak out.

This should be the 10th Amendment showdown of the decade. Ask yourself why an amendment to the Constitution was needed for alcohol prohibition? Why didn’t the feds just pass a law like they have for the criminalization of marijuana? Why would you ever amend the Constitution? Just pass a federal law. This case will prove the point if the feds act against the interests of California. This shows the further expansion of federal powers over the states and the public. (End of civics lecture).


Sally Davis a New York-based photographer — and decades-long vegetarian — took a McDonald’s Happy Meal home six months ago to see if what she had read online about a school teacher with a 12-year-old McDonald’s burger could possibly be true (spoiler alert: it is). Davies’ friend claimed the food would mold or rot within 2-3 days and that the story of the 12-year-old burger was nothing more than a tall tale.

Davies described it from there to the Huffington Post:

I planned to photograph the decomposing burger every day to monitor the process, and send to my friend! I started a page on Facebook called “McDonalds Happy Meal Project” and also on Flickr posting all the photographs. After a week or two, the photographs were very boring, as nothing was happening. at all. So I only photograph them every week or two after that. Not much has changed since April 10, 2010 on Day one. The top bun is very dry and a small part snapped off. The burger shrank as it dried out, but nothing much else. …

As Refinery29 wrote when they covered the project at the 137-day mark, “the results are remarkable in the fact that they’re really unremarkable.” The Daily Mail referred to the “seemingly indestructible fast food meal’s progress as it refuses to yield to the forces of nature.” The Happy Meal stopped smelling of anything after only a couple days, and the only change that really seemed to occur was that it essentially plasticized. “At six months old, the food is plastic to the touch and has an acrylic sheen to it. The only change that I can see is that it has become hard as a rock,” Davies told the Mail.

Hmmmm… Ronald McDonald looks exactly the same as when I was a kid. Coincidence? I think not!


Hoooray for incompetent design! Or lack thereof.

The US government worries that terrorists could take down the country’s electrical grid just by hitting a small node in the system. But a new study reveals the grid is too unreliable for that kind of attack.

Last year, network theorists published some papers suggesting that terrorists could take down the entire US electrical grid by attacking a small, remote power station. But new research shows that network theory models, which [work] great for analyzing many complex systems, don’t work for patchwork systems like the US electrical grid. Basically, the grid was set up so haphazardly that you’d have to take out a major node before you’d affect the entire thing.



Was doing this an Obama & Co.’s political death wish? It’s sort of like selling terrorists bomb making materials, blind to the fact they’ll use them against you.

With a little over two weeks to go to the critical elections, why would the Obama White House want reporters (and voters) to fixate on what it got wrong in its first two years? That’s the question prompted by the appearance this week of a made-for-cable-chatter New York Times Magazine story.
[…]
Obama and his crew stand by their policy achievements—the stimulus, the health care overhaul, Wall Street reform—but they concede that they have screwed up the political calculus. “Given how much stuff was coming at us,” Obama told Baker, “we probably spent much more time trying to get the policy right than trying to get the politics right.” Obama explained: “I think anybody who’s occupied this office has to remember that success is determined by an intersection in policy and politics and that you can’t be neglecting of marketing and PR and public opinion.” The president also noted that he allowed his political foes to identify him as “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.” Baker describes Obama’s “self-diagnosis” this way: “[T]he figure of inspiration from 2008 neglected the inspiration after his election. He didn’t stay connected to the people who put him in office in the first place.”
[…]
There are not many days left before voters hit the polls for the critical midterm elections. Now is not the moment for a high-profile “We blew the politics” admission. The White House ought to be in full attack mode.
[…]
The fallout from the Times story will compete with the message the Democrats truly need to hammer home in the next 19 days: A Republican takeover of the House and/or Senate will mark a triumph for the wealthy and such special interests as Big Oil and Big Finance. At this point, Democratic congressional candidates will not be aided by Obama acknowledging the obvious: “We neglected politics.”


I bring this to your attention because of something I heard from some Republican strategies a few years back. They were lamenting the fact that the Democrats and progressives had documentary filmmakers in their pockets (aka Michael Moore) and the Republicans had nothing. They saw the documentary as a good method for distribution of a propagandistic message. I suspect it will be a while before they get the bugs worked out. This thing will never see a theatrical release.I’d bet money on it. These folks do not understand how to do these things properly.


« Previous PageNext Page »

Bad Behavior has blocked 12116 access attempts in the last 7 days.