Government agents can sneak onto your property in the middle of the night, put a GPS device on the bottom of your car and keep track of everywhere you go. This doesn’t violate your Fourth Amendment rights, because you do not have any reasonable expectation of privacy in your own driveway — and no reasonable expectation that the government isn’t tracking your movements.

That is the bizarre — and scary — rule that now applies in California and eight other Western states. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which covers this vast jurisdiction, recently decided the government can monitor you in this way virtually anytime it wants — with no need for a search warrant.

It is a dangerous decision — one that, as the dissenting judges warned, could turn America into the sort of totalitarian state imagined by George Orwell. It is particularly offensive because the judges added insult to injury with some shocking class bias: the little personal privacy that still exists, the court suggested, should belong mainly to the rich.

Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, who dissented from this month’s decision refusing to reconsider the case, pointed out whose homes are not open to strangers: rich people’s. The court’s ruling, he said, means that people who protect their homes with electric gates, fences and security booths have a large protected zone of privacy around their homes. People who cannot afford such barriers have to put up with the government sneaking around at night.

Here’s a cheap way to block the GPS tracking, at least until they figure out a way around it.



This Episode’s Executive Producers: Sir Paul Couture, Eric Gray
Associate Excutive Producer: Thomas Hithhaler
Art By: Sir Paul T.

No Agenda Survey Results

Listen to show by clicking ►

Direct link to show.
Show notes here.
Show forum here.
Donate to show here or here.
Sign up for No Agenda Show Newsletter signup here.


  • HP and Dell really going at it over 3Par.
  • iPod classics may be dumped.
  • RIMM doing deal with India.
  • Why does Google search tweets?
  • Fake reviews under attack.
  • I like Yelp.
  • Facebook killing IE6 support. Laughable.
  • Government wants Craigslist to cease “Adult Services” listings. This will be fun to watch.
  • Kindle and iPad under discussion.
  • H.264 breakthrough.

click to listen:

 

Right click here and select ‘Save Link As…’ to download the mp3 file.

For a non-Flash version, click here.

Today’s Guests:

The Topics:

Download this Episode:

Right click and choose “save target as” or “save as” to download videos.


San Francisco is always associated with its historic cable cars, but the city is often overlooked for its historic streetcars that now run year-round in regular service. Above is the classic PCC car from Philadelphia Suburban from the 1940’s. Dallas, Texas and other cities have run historic streetcars on certain lines, but as far as I can tell, SF has been the most serious about this.


Would you be willing to pay the original builder a fee when you resell your home? That’s an obligation some developers are trying to slap on homeowners in their communities.

Many condo and townhouse dwellers are already familiar with the “flip tax,” more formally known as a resale fee. Typically calculated as a percentage of the sale price, it’s a fee due to the condo association or community when an owner sells. These charges fund common-area maintenance or provide a boost to reserve funds, which benefits the association’s homeowners.

But in some new developments, homebuilders are including in contracts a 1% fee to be paid to them every time the house is sold — for 99 years. And the money doesn’t go for improvements or upkeep: It’s just money in the builders’ pockets.

That has the real estate industry and consumer protection groups up in arms.

“It’s of no benefit to consumers,” said Kathleen Day, of the Center for Responsible Lending. “It’s another innovative way to price gouge. Every extra dollar they suck out of people’s wallets takes away from other spending. It’s not good for the economy.”


Here is the latest conversation I had with money manager Andrew Horowitz…. new insights for anyone who invests in anything. This week the housing market goes back into the dumper. I double dip in the cards?

Click here for non-Flash version.

click ► to listen:

 
Right click here and select ‘Save Link As…’ to download the mp3 file.


 

Contribute to the future of the show here.


A State Highway Patrol cruiser cam caught the accident at about 7:15 a.m. Monday, Aug. 23.


Simcoe County school district in Ontario, Canada last year invested thousands of dollars on new wireless internet routers. As a result, students on a K-12 level have better access to the internet’s wealth of resources for their studies.

However, some of the district’s parents are immersed in a state of panic. They say the Wi-Fi is making their children sick. Simcoe resident Rodney Palmer, who has two children, 5 and 9 years old, bemoans, “Six months ago, parents started noticing their kids had chronic headaches, dizziness, insomnia, rashes and other neurological and cardiac symptoms when their kids came home from school.”

Palmer is going to pull his kids out of the schools to avoid exposing them to what he considers a toxic environment.

The only problem is that repeated studies have shown that the kinds of wireless signals used in consumer electronics are safe and pose no identifiable health risk. Michael First, a professor of clinical psychiatry at Columbia University in New York City and editor of the DSM-IV, the diagnostic handbook for psychologists, states, “As far as I’m aware, there is no evidence that any kind of radio frequency radiation (including cellphone towers, cellphones themselves,and also including Wi-Fi) cause any negative health effects.”

Strangely the public has shown little concern over TV or FM radios, which both offer a greater electromagnetic radiation than Wi-Fi routers.


Spotted at the Two Neat store in Mill Valley, California.


The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
The Parent Company Trap
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Tea Party

Let’s be honest: We’re all writing and talking so much about the Park51 Muslim cultural center planned downtown because of two things. One, the upcoming midterm elections, and two (possibly even more important), because it’s August and there’s nothing else to talk about. But that doesn’t mean we have to be ridiculous about it. That’s been Jon Stewart’s point in recent days on the Daily Show. He argues that Fox News has gone to such an absurd extreme to stir up controversy that they’re deliberately ignoring a glaring hypocrisy. That is, that the potential Park51 funder that they accuse of having dangerous Middle East ties is also the second largest shareholder in Fox’s parent company, News Corp. Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal owns about $2.3 billion in stock with News Corp. and is an ally of Rupert Murdoch’s. But Fox commentators would have you believe that you should be worried about him funding Park51 because he is dangerous, and “funds radical madrassas all over the world.”

Obviously, Fox News working up fears to keep people tuned in is nothing new. All the cable networks do it. But this particular story line seems particularly glaring in its baldness. So we reached out to Fox News about Stewart’s point. They had no comment, and directed us to News Corp. A News Corp. spokesman also had no comment.

It’s all so confusing….or is it?


Comments Off on Time Magazine, Not Just for Kids!

After serving up 38 million ads from a group supporting the legalization of marijuana since August 7, Facebook told the group on August 16 that it could no longer use a pot leaf in its ad, since it might promote smoking.

“The image in question was no longer acceptable for use in Facebook ads,” wrote Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes in an e-mail to Wired.com. “The image of a marijuana leaf is classified with all smoking products and therefore is not acceptable under our policies.”

But the Just Say Now campaign contests that Facebook isn’t harshing on their mellow — it’s censoring them, especially given that marijuana legalization is on the ballot in the upcoming election in California. And it’s calling on its supporters — some 6,000 fans on its Facebook page — to swap out their profile picture for an image of a pot leaf with a banned box over it.

“We aren’t trying to sell people pot. This is a policy issue,” Hamsher told Wired.com, noting that more than 50 percent of inmates in the federal prison system were there on drug charges and that law-and-order types like former Reagan administration lawyer Bruce Fein support decriminalization. “The time is right for this and Facebook shutting this down is a real blow when we are trying to open up a conversation…”

It seems like a decision made to appease somebody’s grandma,” Hamsher said.

Or a decision made to appease some nanny investor.


  • Samsung getting into Android Tablet biz.
  • Dell starts selling Smartphone.
  • Nokia into 3D? What? Why? Fuji display?
  • Now Toshiba wants a big version and proposes a large version somehow.
  • Web scam hits iTunes and Paypal.
  • North Korean pages deleted? What?
  • Grand Canyon at risk from mining.
  • Apple kickback scheme was done with shoeboxes full of money. HAR!
  • Intel wants to beat ARM. Well, OK.

click to listen:

 

Right click here and select ‘Save Link As…’ to download the mp3 file.

Touching.


« Previous PageNext Page »

Bad Behavior has blocked 10834 access attempts in the last 7 days.