![]()
|
For amateur astronomers, discovering a supernova is a significant and rare feat. For a 10-year-old amateur to do it — well, that’s astronomical.
Kathryn Aurora Gray of Fredericton, N.B. is basking in the spotlight after noticing what was later determined to be a magnitude 17 supernova, or exploding star, on New Year’s Eve.
It’s in the distant galaxy UGC 3378, about 240 million light years away, in the constellation of Camelopardalis.
The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada says Kathryn is the youngest person to make such a discovery, which was soon verified by amateur astronomers in Illinois and Arizona. The finding has been reported to, confirmed and announced by the International Astronomical Union…
She is still on Christmas break, so none of her schoolmates know yet, except for one of her friends who popped by for a play date Monday…
“It’s fantastic that someone so young would be passionate about astronomy. What an incredible discovery. We’re all very excited,” said Deborah Thompson, executive director of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada.
The new supernova is called Supernova 2010lt.
I think it should be called Kathryn.
Just like with Watergate: Follow the money.
In 2003, Mary’s 26-year-old son, Dan, was enrolled against her wishes in a psychiatric drug study at the University of Minnesota, where I teach medical ethics. Less than six months later, Dan was dead. I’d learned about his death from a deeply unsettling newspaper series by St. Paul Pioneer Press reporters Jeremy Olson and Paul Tosto that suggested he was coerced into a pharmaceutical-industry study from which the university stood to profit, but which provided him with inadequate care. Over the next few months, I talked to several university colleagues and administrators, trying to learn what had happened. Many of them dismissed the story as slanted and incomplete. Yet the more I examined the medical and court records, the more I became convinced that the problem was worse than the Pioneer Press had reported. The danger lies not just in the particular circumstances that led to Dan’s death, but in a system of clinical research that has been thoroughly co-opted by market forces, so that many studies have become little more than covert instruments for promoting drugs. The study in which Dan died starkly illustrates the hazards of market-driven research and the inadequacy of our current oversight system to detect them.
This Episode’s Executive Producers: Adam Curry & John C. Dvorak
Art By: Nick the Rat
Sign up for No Agenda Show Talking Points signup here.
No Agenda Survey Results
Listen to show by clicking ►
Direct link to show.
Show Notes here.
Show forum here.
Sign up for No Agenda Talking Points Newsletter signup here.
A topless sunbather is being investigated by police after being accused of sensuously rubbing sun cream on herself on a public beach. Police were called to a beach at Anzio south of Rome by a furious mother who said the way the “attractive” sunbather was rubbing lotion on her body had “troubled her sons aged 14 and 12.”
“Troubled.” Not the word that springs to mind about what 12 and 14 yr old boys are feeling while seeing her.
The mother said she had asked the 26-year-old woman, identified only as Luisa under Italian privacy laws, to cover herself up. But the woman, still topless, refused and an argument broke out and police were called.
[…]
The complaint has triggered a debate in Italy about topless bathing, with the Luisa’s lawyer calling the incident “absurd”.“She is amazed that she is being condemned for simply sunbathing topless,” lawyer Gianluca Arrighi said. “’Let’s be clear my client is tall, brunette and has an ample breast and is therefore going to naturally be sensuous when she applies cream to her chest.”
Of course, in the USofA, she would have been wrestled to the ground by a conscientious cop and then tazed. To save the children, of course.
The tax deduction for charitable contributions was an early feature of the US income tax code, introduced in 1917 because of a concern that the wealthy would stop donating to higher education when hit by higher taxes for World War I.
[…]
In total, therefore, charitable tax exemptions cost the Treasury about $130 billion, or on the cuckoo 10-year accounting used in budget calculations, some $1.8 trillion over the period 2011-2020 – which would make a decent dent even in that decade’s horrendous budget deficits. In addition, state and local tax exemptions for charities cost $30-50 billion. The charitable contribution income tax deduction is very inefficient according to a 2009 Congressional Research Service (CRS) study of the sector; thus its $54 billion cost increases charitable donations by only about $27 billion.
[…]
Apart from charities’ adverse effect on the economy itself, there are a number of reasons why this could be a bad thing:
- The innumerable scams in charitable donations of automobiles and other property;
- The ability of Wall Street hotshots to leverage their social life through “charitable dinners” and other charitable events, a substantial portion of the costs of which are borne by much poorer taxpayers;
- The raucous propaganda and lobbying activities, almost universally in favor of bad public policy, by the charities themselves;
- The uncounted “hedonic” cost to the public as a whole of being subjected to continuous obnoxious fundraising.
Given charities’ averse effect on the economy, their own economic inefficiency, the great inefficiency of the charitable tax deduction and the disinclination of the very rich to give charitable donations to the poor, it is clear that the charitable deduction should be ended, as should the tax exemption for charities’ income, the tax exemption on their real estate and their other benefits from the public purse. Since excessive charitable activity is economically damaging, such activity should no longer be subsidized by the remainder of the economy.
“Just send us your cash.”
— George W. Bush on donations for Haiti
Borders has been delaying payments to book publishers in signs that it may be one of the first major victims of e-books. Early reports from Publishers Marketplace on Friday said it was putting off the payments to help refinance its debt but also wasn’t certain that the plan would be effective. It might have to break its existing credit deals early into 2011 after facing a “liquidity shortfall,” it said.
[…]
E-books have been credited in part to the damage done to Borders and even more successful stores like Barnes & Noble, where digital downloads are mostly replacing paper copies rather than adding to the business. Borders has been exploring the possibility of financing from an investor to buy Barnes & Noble and get a successful business through a takeover.Any financial collapse at Borders could have a ripple effect on the e-book business. It would cost Kobo one of its most important markets for e-readers and would close one of the few major online book stores. The shift could feed Amazon, Apple and other survivors with extra customers.
In a vaguely not unrelated topic, here’s one guy’s take on how iPads, etc. are killing the old media model.
Wouldn’t it be better to find a Democrat to replace Obama who could beat any Republican? Or for Obama to govern better (that should be easy) so that he could win fair and square? This is either a joke that some are taking seriously or after their November bashing, Dems are looking for a Hail Mary to hold on to the WH.
What is the purpose of your web site [PrimariesForPalin.com]?
Our purpose is to have Democrats and Independents help to nominate Sarah Palin as the Republican candidate for president in state primaries. In numerous head-to-head polls, Palin is the only likely Republican candidate who would soundly lose to Obama in the general election. All other likely Republican candidates either beat Obama or are statistically tied with Obama. If Palin is nominated, Obama’s chances for reelection are greatly improved.How can a few thousand votes in each state make a difference?
Since several Republicans will likely run for the presidential nomination, it will be easier to influence that vote because of the number of candidates. A few thousand extra votes for Palin could make a difference. In Iowa in 2008, Huckabee beat Romney by approximately 11,000 votes. In New Hampshire in 2008, McCain beat Romney by approximately 13,000 votes.Are you afraid of Palin winning the presidency?
We are afraid of any Republican winning the presidency. However, having Sarah Palin as the Republican nominee gives Obama the best chance at reelection. While having Palin so close to the presidency is a bit of a calculated risk, numerous polls show that Obama would soundly defeat Palin.
Here’s one take on the website. Here’s one from Alaska.
|
Seems Cars Keep Coming
Gabrielle Silva takes down a customer’s order from the drive-thru window, stuffs a bag full of products and passes it outside to the couple waiting in a car.
“Thanks, and I put some free condoms in there, too!” Silva chirps.
In this technology-savvy north Alabama city, visitors won’t just find burgers and prescriptions at the drive-thru window.
A “romance” store called Pleasures offers a rare convenience not only for these parts but nationally: a drive-through with adult novelties for sale. Business is brisk so far, with cars sometimes lining up three deep for vibrators, lubricants, lingerie and other risque items.
Is this today’s ultimate instant gratification? With my luck, some nosy do-gooder would be taking video of my car and license plate.

Click pic to see all the steps involved
If you Google ‘lightsaber’, you’ll discover there’s a huge market in building and selling them. I’m waiting for the ‘real’ ones that can kill so that I can read about those on one side arguing that they should be regulated or banned since they’re obviously not protected by the 2nd Amendment and those on the other side using the phrase, “Lightsabers don’t kill people, people kill people!”
Not sure which is more amazing: politicians lie or that the electorate believes them. Who could possibly have known either? Other than watching the pols actions or seeing who gets elected, I suppose.
Following the first election since the Supreme Court has struck down limits on election-related advertising, a new poll finds that 9 in 10 voters said that in the 2010 election they encountered information they believed was misleading or false, with 56% saying this occurred frequently. Fifty-four percent said that it had been more frequent than usual, while just three percent said it was less frequent than usual, according to the poll conducted by WorldPublicOpinion.org, based at the University of Maryland, and Knowledge Networks.
Equally significant, the poll found strong evidence that voters were substantially misinformed on many of the key issues of the campaign. Such misinformation was correlated with how people voted and their exposure to various news sources.
Voters’ misinformation included beliefs at odds with the conclusions of government agencies, generally regarded as non-partisan, consisting of professional economists and scientists.
Read the article for what the electorate was ignorant of and/or bamboozled on. Two bottom lines: We’re idiots and we get what we deserve. Will we ever learn?



The
Given charities’ averse effect on the economy, their own economic inefficiency, the great inefficiency of the charitable tax deduction and the disinclination of the very rich to give charitable donations to the poor, it is clear that the charitable deduction should be ended, as should the tax exemption for charities’ income, the tax exemption on their real estate and their other benefits from the public purse. Since excessive charitable activity is economically damaging, such activity should no longer be subsidized by the remainder of the economy.
Borders has been delaying payments to book publishers in signs that it may be one of the 



Equally significant, the poll found strong evidence that voters were substantially misinformed on many of the key issues of the campaign. Such misinformation was correlated with how people voted and their exposure to various news sources.













